Non-Conformance, Process Deviations, and Quality Incidents in Food Manufacturing

The Food Industry Hub Blog

Food Industry Hub blog

The Food Industry Hub blog includes practical discussion for food manufacturing professionals across technical, cultural, management and professional themes.

This post is part of the category:

Introduction

For food manufacturers, understanding and properly addressing non-conformance, process deviations, and quality incidents is fundamental to continuous improvement and risk mitigation. In this blog post, we will take a comprehensive look at these quality events, their causes and documentation processes – before delving deeper into how food businesses should assess the risk associated with non-conformities followed by corrective actions to be taken. We will discuss root cause analysis as a method for determining contributing factors before running through timescales for corrective and preventative actions in order to manage the allocation of responsibilities for measures taken towards consistent improvement and prevention of recurrence.

As we dive into the topic, you’ll be interested to know that Food Industry Hub offers integrated management systems for food manufacturers, which you can use to strengthen your assurance processes.

Table of Contents

Introduction: Defining Non-Conformance, Process Deviations, and Quality Incidents

Non-conformance, process deviations, and quality incidents refer to unintended or undesirable occurrences within the quality system. These can be expressed in many forms, including procedural non-compliance, recipe deviation, unwanted behaviours, pest activity, equipment failure, and many more.

Operational non-conformances can introduce risks to food safety, quality, authenticity, and legality – so it’s important to identify incidents and operational non-conformances when they occur, and take action to reduce the likelihood of repeat instances in the future.

It’s important to understand the distinction between a non-conformance, the consequence or harmful outcome; and the actions that need to be taken to remedy the situation. For example, if contamination is identified at the metal detector, the original non-conformance would be the contamination of product by metal (discovered through the use of foreign-body detection equipment), the consequences of that contamination incident could include product safety risks (were the contaminated product to be placed onto the market), and remedial actions might include disposal of the affected material and elimination of the contamination hazard (e.g. equipment wear/degradation).

To further illustrate, receipt of a customer complaint is not in itself a non-conformance or incident, but can serve as notification of a defect resulting from a quality incident.

Non-conformance, process deviations, and quality incidents

Clear and Detailed Documentation of The Non-Conformity

Clear and detailed documentation of any non-conformity that occurs is essential so that food manufacturers can review and understand problems that arise. Clearly, it would not be possible for the management team to collectively review unintended events in the absence of documented accounts of the incidents that have occurred.

For any such occurrence, it’s important to keep detailed and accurate records of the nature of the deviation and any apparent risks to product safety, quality, legality, and authenticity. Records should be sufficiently detailed to allow retrospective review of the incident, a timeline of events, affected materials and/or equipment, individuals involved, and any factors that may need to be trended of compared to similar incidents.

This includes documenting any changes or deviations from accepted procedures. It is important to save all relevant information regarding the issue, including notes on observations, corrective measures taken, and results achieved. Additionally, accurate records should be kept of all personnel involved in the process so that if necessary further investigation can be conducted. By having a clear and detailed record of any manifestations of non-conformance, manufacturers can quickly identify root causes and take swift corrective action accordingly.

Documentation and recordkeeping are fundamental to incidents management

Assessment of Consequences – Establishing Risk

Assessing the consequences of non-conformance, process deviations, and quality incidents is a critical step in managing risks as an outcome of an incident. This involves evaluating how severe the issue is and what potential risks it poses to safety or quality of end products. It also requires an understanding of any possible legal implications that may arise from these issues. Organisations should consider factors such as frequency, severity, impact on customers/consumers, cost involved in rectifying the problem etc. to get a comprehensive view of the risk associated with non-conformance.

All these assessments must be done thoroughly in order for food manufacturers to remain compliant while minimising any negative effects caused by issues that arise. The primary consideration should be the prevention of potentially unsafe product from being released onto the market, so the person in charge of assessing the consequences of a quality incident must have a thorough grounding in food safety. The assessment of consequences should not be limited to material directly affected by the incident, but should consider any residual risks that apply to the process or environment with the potential to impact subsequentially-processed materials. There is a very clear need to communicate risk information to the HACCP team for any food safety hazards identified.

Risk-assessment informs the nature and urgency of corrective actions

Sign up for the Food Industry Hub Mail Service

Receive Food Industry Hub updates, resources, articles, tools and service developments direct to your inbox.

Each update helps you stay connected with new and relevant Food Industry Hub content, with links back to resources you may want to read, use or revisit.

Immediate Corrective Actions

Immediate corrective actions serve to control the risks in the immediate aftermath of a non-conformance or quality incident. Typically, these are actions taken immediately as an incident is discovered, independent of the larger investigation and resultant corrective and preventative actions.

What was done to control the situation immediately as the deviation became apparent? How were risks mitigated?

Consider a glass breakage incident. The immediate corrective actions might include segregating the area, moving personal out in a controlled fashion, and replacing footwear to prevent spreading contamination. The immediate corrective actions serve to mitigate and control risks in advance of detailed investigation.

Immediate corrective actions should primarily control food safety and quality risks

Root Cause Analysis – Determining Causes and Contributing Factors

Root cause analysis is a method used to identify and analyse the underlying reasons why certain issues have occurred. It involves an in-depth look into each contributing factor that has led up to the incident, such as processes, materials or people involved. This helps organisations better understand what went wrong, so they can make informed decisions on how to prevent similar problems from happening again in future.

By determining causes and contributing factors, food manufacturers are able to take actions designed to address the underlying causes with a view to prevention of recurrence. The intent is to address the factors that allowed for the occurrence of an incident, rather than focusing on the particular way a problem was manifested. This allows food manufacturers to identify any potential areas for improvement within their operations which can be addressed before further incidents occur. Root cause analysis is an important tool for food manufacturers that enables them to optimise quality assurance processes and reduce risks associated with non-conformance or process deviations.

The first step of root cause analysis involves gathering information related to the issue at hand – this could include records from observations made by personnel during production or data collected as part of the investigation. After all relevant information has been gathered it’s time for a thorough evaluation of each contributing factor that could have caused the problem; this includes looking into environmental factors, working practice, operational procedures, and people. Once all these aspects have been investigated the investigation should make an assessment of proximal causes and ultimately the root case.

Being able to accurately determine causes & contributing factors through root cause analysis provides food manufacturers with invaluable insight into their operations allowing them to improve process control and quality assurance measures.

The investigation should identify contributing factors and the ultimate root cause

Setting Appropriate Timescales for Corrective and Preventative Actions

It’s important that all necessary steps are taken in a timely manner so that problems can be dealt with efficiently and effectively. By setting realistic deadlines, food manufacturers will be able to ensure that any issues are addressed quickly before they become more serious or cause further contamination of products. This also allows them to identify potential areas for improvement within their operations which can then be addressed in order to reduce risk associated with non-conformance or process deviations.

When establishing appropriate timescales for corrective and preventative actions it’s important to consider variables such as complexity of issue at hand, resources available and overall impact on production if left unresolved. For instance, if the problem requires additional personnel or equipment then this should factor into how long an action might take – similarly, if the issue relates directly to a particular product batch, then immediate resolution may be needed due to potential health risks posed by contaminated goods. Having clear timelines set out helps keep teams focused while providing accountability in terms of who is responsible for taking each step towards rectifying the problem, which ultimately leads to better outcomes.

Timescales for actions should be based on urgency and resource

Allocating Responsibility – Managing Remedial Actions

It’s important for food manufacturers to clearly define who is responsible for each step of the process when allocating responsibility for managing remedial actions. This helps ensure that tasks are completed in a timely manner and allows organisations to have greater control over their corrective action plans as they can track progress from start to finish. It also provides accountability, ensuring that any issues are dealt with swiftly and efficiently without anything slipping through the cracks. Having clear roles assigned makes it easier for teams to work together collaboratively when dealing with complex problems or multiple investigations that run concurrently.

It’s important that responsibilities are allocated based on individual experience and expertise; this ensures that employees are able to effectively carry out their duties while minimising risk associated with non-conformance or process deviations. Additionally, assigning specific roles also helps prevent confusion which can occur when there is no clear understanding of who should be doing what – this ultimately leads to better outcomes as everyone involved can focus on their own area of responsibility instead of trying to do everything haphazardly. Allocating responsibility properly provides food manufacturers with an effective way of managing remedial actions while helping them achieve desired results more quickly and efficiently.

Proper allocation of responsibility enables remediual actions to be implemented effectively

Effectiveness of Corrective and Preventative Actions – Verifying Improvement Initiatives

Verifying the effectiveness of corrective and preventative actions is helpful in verifying that food manufacturers are taking the necessary steps to improve their operations. This involves conducting audits and reviews to assess whether changes made have had a positive impact on product quality or process safety. It’s important for food manufacturers to regularly review existing procedures, processes, and standards in order to identify any areas where improvement can be made. This could include assessing elements such as risk management, employee training or equipment maintenance protocols. Additionally, it’s important for organisations to ensure that adequate measures are being taken when implementing new initiatives – which helps verify that objectives are being met and allows them to make any necessary adjustments should results not be satisfactory.

When verifying improvement initiatives, it’s important for food manufacturers to consider all aspects of the process from data collection & analysis through implementation & monitoring. This helps ensure that all relevant factors have been considered before making decisions about how best move forward with an initiative – as well as helping identify potential risks associated with changes which may need addressing first before proceeding further. Ultimately though, by verifying improvements through regular assessments & reviews, organisations can gain valuable insights into their operations while helping them achieve desired results more quickly and efficiently.

Verification of the effectiveness of corrective and preventative actione

In Summary

Through careful management of non-conformities, process deviations, and quality incidents, you can ensure that your business remains compliant with regulations and legislation while minimising risk. It all starts with clear and detailed documentation of the issue, followed by an assessment of consequences to establish risk. By implementing immediate corrective actions in a timely manner, root cause analysis for determining underlying causes and contributing factors, setting appropriate timescales for corrective and preventative action initiatives, allocating responsibility for remedial measures as well as verifying improvement initiatives are crucial steps to manage non-conformance accurately. All these steps together will allow you to monitor the effectiveness of your remediation actions in order to protect your business from further issues.

Incidents management is a function of quality assurance and quality control

Further Resources

Food Industry Hub serves the food industry with a range of digital resources for the benefit of both commercial food manufacturers and food industry professionals.

For food manufacturers, we offer integrated management systems that give every user a direct interface with your QMS.

For food industry professionals, we provide an extensive signposting service in addition to informational content we hope you’ll find useful as you face new professional challenges. We have very ambitious plans to expand the range of services offered, and currently present informational content on management, safety and quality, and professional success.

How operational records become trustworthy evidence

How operational records become trustworthy evidence

A completed form needs context to support a decision A completed check sheet tells a site that somebody entered information. It does not, by itself, tell a later reader what happened or whether a technical decision was justified. The evidential test is more demanding:...

Controlled documents must stay usable from approval to recovery

Controlled documents must stay usable from approval to recovery

A food factory can have a current procedure in its register and still run an older method on the line. The approved file may sit in a central system while a printed copy, a shared-terminal shortcut or a recording form still directs the work. Document control has...

Point-of-use document control depends on access and withdrawal

Point-of-use document control depends on access and withdrawal

A food factory can approve a new work instruction, update its register and still run a shift from the old one. The current file may be correct in the central system, while a printed copy beside the line, a saved download or an inaccessible terminal determines what the...

An approved procedure does not prove food factory work has changed

An approved procedure does not prove food factory work has changed

A revised factory procedure may have been reviewed, authorised and entered in the controlled-document register. These are important controls on the information itself. They do not show whether the new instruction reached the affected work areas, replaced old copies or...

A food factory control can be implemented without being effective

A food factory control can be implemented without being effective

A new procedure has been approved. People have been trained, equipment is available, and the first set of records is complete. Those are useful facts about implementation. They leave another question open: is the control being delivered when and where it is needed,...

Food safety and quality controls depend on designed handoffs

Food safety and quality controls depend on designed handoffs

An engineering repair can be complete while a production line is still unfit to restart. The equipment may need cleaning, a documented hygiene clearance and a decision about product exposed during the work. In that situation, the crucial control is not contained...

CAPA must connect immediate control with verified system change

CAPA must connect immediate control with verified system change

A non-conformity often creates two kinds of work at once. Someone must decide what the finding means for product and the work happening now. The site also needs to understand why its control allowed the finding and whether a change will prevent a repeat. Corrective...

Pest management must connect prevention with verified response

Pest management must connect prevention with verified response

A pest-management visit can finish on schedule while a damaged door seal remains open, waste accumulates beside a loading bay, or a recommendation waits for a maintenance slot. The service record shows that someone attended. It does not, by itself, show that the site...

Environmental monitoring should change when the evidence changes

Environmental monitoring should change when the evidence changes

An environmental-monitoring programme can meet its sampling schedule and still miss the question it was created to answer. Points may be easy to reach rather than relevant to a contamination route. Results may be recorded without enough context to compare them. A...

Cleaning works when the whole hygiene cycle is controlled

Cleaning works when the whole hygiene cycle is controlled

A cleaning record can be complete while the equipment is still unfit for the next product. The scheduled method may have missed a joint, the cleaning window may have been shortened, or the check may have looked for the wrong kind of residue. None of these failures is...

Keep finished-product status explicit until release or disposition

Keep finished-product status explicit until release or disposition

A finished pallet is not necessarily a releasable pallet. Production may have ended while a packaging check, laboratory result, deviation assessment or reconciliation remains open. If the stock moves because the line is complete, the warehouse has space or the system...

Authenticity assurance needs a continuous chain of evidence

Authenticity assurance needs a continuous chain of evidence

A supplier file can look complete while the material it describes has changed route. The certificate is current, the specification has an approved version and the last test was satisfactory. Yet a new intermediary may now source from a different processing site, or a...

A risk assessment needs a reasoned conclusion, not just a risk rating

A risk assessment needs a reasoned conclusion, not just a risk rating

A risk assessment can assign “low” to a hazard and still leave a production team unable to explain why the product is protected. The label may be familiar, but it does not show how the hazard could reach the product, which control interrupts that route, or what would...

A complete production record can still leave an evidence gap

A complete production record can still leave an evidence gap

A production record can be complete in every visible box and still fail when somebody needs it. The question may arise during product release, an investigation or a traceability exercise: which product did this check cover, what was actually observed, and what...

Pet food and feed safety begins with the animal the product is for

Pet food and feed safety begins with the animal the product is for

A production record can show that a feed batch met its recipe and passed its routine checks. Those facts matter, but the safety question is incomplete until the site can say which animal the product is for and how it is meant to be used. A material suitable in one...

Control non-food chemicals from approval to disposal

Control non-food chemicals from approval to disposal

A chemical store can be orderly, locked and fully inventoried while a food line still has weak chemical control. The greatest opportunity for product exposure may arise after a container leaves that store: when a concentrate is dispensed, a solution is made up, a...

Food factory access control should work beyond the perimeter gate

Food factory access control should work beyond the perimeter gate

A controlled gate can tell a food factory who entered the site. It cannot, on its own, tell the site whether that person was entitled to enter a production room, open a product store, reach a process-control panel or work beside exposed material. Those internal...

Turn post-incident review into verified system change

Turn post-incident review into verified system change

An incident may be operationally contained before the system that allowed it has changed. Product is held or recovered, customers receive the necessary information, stock is reconciled and the immediate team stands down. Those are substantial achievements. They do not...

What consistent product results cannot show about process control

What consistent product results cannot show about process control

A run of acceptable finished-product results is welcome news. It does not explain how the process produced them. A line can deliver a familiar appearance or test result while operators make undocumented adjustments, equipment runs with an altered setting, or...

Keep a traded product inside the assurance system

Keep a traded product inside the assurance system

A business may sell a food product without making it. The manufacturing controls sit with another organisation, often at a site the seller never sees. That changes how the seller obtains assurance, but it does not make the product invisible to its food safety and...

Fast digital traceability can still give the wrong product history

Fast digital traceability can still give the wrong product history

A traceability system can return a batch history in seconds and still leave a food manufacturer with the wrong picture of where material went. The search may be fast because it follows exactly the links stored in the system. If a link was never captured, points to the...

Supplier certification supports approval, but the site still decides

Supplier certification supports approval, but the site still decides

A supplier certificate can save a food manufacturer from treating every approval question as if no independent evidence exists. It may show that a defined site and set of activities have been assessed against a recognised programme. That is useful information. It does...

Food fraud and food defence need different assessments

Food fraud and food defence need different assessments

Food fraud and food defence both concern deliberate human behaviour. That similarity can tempt a site to place them under one “intentional threat” score. The result may be a tidy register that says little about what the site must know or control. A material whose...

Food authenticity claims need evidence from source to pack

Food authenticity claims need evidence from source to pack

An authenticity claim can be correct on a product specification and unsupported for the product that reaches a customer. The specification describes what should be supplied and made. It does not, by itself, show where a particular material batch came from, which batch...

The two decisions behind a complete allergen incident response

The two decisions behind a complete allergen incident response

A product hold can be swift and well documented while the reason for an allergen failure remains poorly understood. The affected stock may be identified, the immediate error corrected and an incident file closed, yet the next production run still depends on the same...

Allergen control must follow the product into its pack

Allergen control must follow the product into its pack

A product can be made under a sound allergen segregation plan and still reach a consumer in the wrong sleeve. The factory may have kept ingredients apart and completed its cleaning checks, but the pack could carry information for an earlier recipe or another product....

HACCP and prerequisite programmes work as one hazard-control system

HACCP and prerequisite programmes work as one hazard-control system

A HACCP plan can identify hazards, name control points and assign monitoring, yet still rest on an operating condition that no longer exists. A hygienic route may have changed. Cleaning may no longer reach a modified surface. A maintenance backlog may leave a barrier...

What HACCP verification needs to test beyond monitoring records

What HACCP verification needs to test beyond monitoring records

A completed monitoring record is evidence that someone recorded a result. It does not automatically show that the right product was measured, the process followed the route in the HACCP plan, the instrument represented the condition of concern, or action was effective...

The decisions that cannot wait after a HACCP deviation

The decisions that cannot wait after a HACCP deviation

A monitoring result outside a critical limit tells a food manufacturer that a defined control has not operated within its required boundary. It rarely tells the whole story. The cause may be a process fault, an instrument problem, an operating mistake or an incomplete...

Why CCP status does not rank food safety controls

Why CCP status does not rank food safety controls

A critical control point has a specific meaning within a HACCP system. It identifies a point where a defined form of control is needed for a significant food safety hazard, with limits, monitoring and action when control is lost. The word “critical” can nevertheless...

Use the HACCP team to expose blind spots

Use the HACCP team to expose blind spots

A HACCP team can include every expected function and still overlook a route by which a hazard reaches product. The roster shows who was invited. The analysis depends on whether the team has an accurate account of materials, equipment, people and work as they actually...

The same food safety hazard can need different controls

The same food safety hazard can need different controls

Two food factories can identify the same hazard and make different control decisions without one of them having overlooked it. The difference may lie in the product, the point in the process where exposure is possible, the people who will eat it, or the controls...

Making uncertainty visible in raw material supply risk decisions

Making uncertainty visible in raw material supply risk decisions

A food manufacturer may need to decide whether an alternate ingredient source can be used before every question about that source has been answered. The difficult part is seldom admitting that information is incomplete. It is making clear which uncertainty matters,...

Why naming a food safety hazard does not identify the right control

Why naming a food safety hazard does not identify the right control

A factory can add a check, a form or a test and still leave the important risk largely untouched. The problem is often visible when someone asks a simple question: where, exactly, does this measure interrupt the route by which harm could occur? If the answer is vague,...

Management information should be built around food safety decisions

Management information should be built around food safety decisions

Start with the decision the information must support A management pack can contain every available food safety and quality measure and still leave its readers unable to decide what to do. The problem is often visible when the same pages return month after month: audit...

Why internal audits must extend beyond the procedure

Why internal audits must extend beyond the procedure

A procedure states intent and an audit tests application A site can show an auditor a current allergen changeover procedure, a training record and a completed checklist. Those documents matter. They identify the expected method and provide a starting trail. They do...

How an approved food safety document can fail to change the work

How an approved food safety document can fail to change the work

Approval is the beginning of the operational change A revised procedure can be correctly reviewed, authorised and filed while people continue to work from its previous version. The document-control transaction is visible: a new number, an approval date and a clean...

Site Standards for Food Manufacturing Facilities

Site Standards for Food Manufacturing Facilities

IntroductionWhen it comes to food manufacturing, site standards are the foundation of food safety, quality, and legal compliance. Every aspect of your facility—from pest control to storage conditions and transportation—plays a crucial role in protecting products from...

Food Raw Material Risk-Assessment

Food Raw Material Risk-Assessment

IntroductionIn food manufacturing, raw materials form the foundation of your finished products, making their safety, quality, and compliance critical to your operations. A raw material risk assessment is a proactive tool that enables you to identify, evaluate, and...

The Food Safety and Quality Management System

The Food Safety and Quality Management System

IntroductionYou're probably aware that ensuring food safety is a complex process. It's not just about selecting the freshest ingredients; it's also about implementing a robust Food Safety and Quality Management System. This system is a comprehensive guide, detailing...

The Food Safety Plan – HACCP

The Food Safety Plan – HACCP

IntroductionHave you ever considered how crucial the Food Safety Plan - HACCP is in preventing foodborne illnesses? By implementing a systematic approach that identifies and controls food safety hazards, it's possible to significantly reduce the risks of biological,...

Senior Management Commitment and Food Safety and Quality Management

Senior Management Commitment and Food Safety and Quality Management

IntroductionConsider the role of senior management in your organisation's food safety and quality management. Senior management commitment isn't just a formality; it's the backbone of establishing and maintaining a culture of accountability and excellence. They're not...

Non-Conforming Product Controls

Non-Conforming Product Controls

IntroductionMaintaining strict controls over non-conforming products is crucial for upholding quality standards. Imagine the impact a single oversight could have on your brand's reputation and customer trust. By implementing robust measures to identify, manage, and...

Risk-Assessing Raw Materials for Food Fraud

Risk-Assessing Raw Materials for Food Fraud

IntroductionAre you looking for a comprehensive guide to conducting a simple and effective vulnerability assessment for raw materials? If so, you’ve come to the right place! This post will provide an overview of why it is important to conduct a vulnerability...

Threat Mitigation For Your QMS

Threat Mitigation For Your QMS

IntroductionImagine a scenario where a food manufacturer's reputation is tarnished due to a product tampering incident that could have been prevented. How can you safeguard your company from such threats? By implementing stringent threat mitigation strategies, you can...

Food Authenticity: How Food Manufacturers Can Combat Food Fraud

Food Authenticity: How Food Manufacturers Can Combat Food Fraud

IntroductionIn a world where food fraud has become increasingly prevalent, the integrity of our food supply chain hangs in the balance. As a food manufacturer, you hold the power to combat this deception and restore trust in the products you produce. Food authenticity...

Unpacking Traceability through Every Stage of Food Manufacturing

Unpacking Traceability through Every Stage of Food Manufacturing

IntroductionHaving full traceability over food manufacturing and production can be a complex process. Every stage needs special consideration to ensure accurate record-keeping, help manage incidents and understand where things come from. This post looks at...

Operational Risk Profiling for Food Manufacturers

Operational Risk Profiling for Food Manufacturers

IntroductionAll businesses are subject to risk, with categories of risk including competition, reputational risks, financial, economic, and political hazards. The scope of this post is limited to food safety, quality, legality, and authenticity risks, and we’ll look...

Food Law and Regulatory Compliance

Food Law and Regulatory Compliance

IntroductionEvery food manufacturer has an obligation to maintain an awareness of – and comply with – applicable regulations. To support, we’ve brought together a range of informational resources which either facilitate regulatory awareness or can be used in support...

Supplier Assurance in Food Manufacturing

Supplier Assurance in Food Manufacturing

IntroductionSupplier assurance updates can fairly time-consuming, but maintaining proper oversight of your supply chain is a key mitigation process against raw material processing risks – so well worth the effort. We’ve signposted to a collection of resources that...

Food Authenticity and Mitigating Food Fraud Risks

Food Authenticity and Mitigating Food Fraud Risks

IntroductionSubstitution, adulteration, and fraud present a uniquely difficult set of authenticity risks for food manufacturers to manage for. Intentional malicious action is inherently challenging to detect and mitigate, because the malicious actor(s) make deliberate...

Supply Chain Risk Monitoring in The Food Industry

Supply Chain Risk Monitoring in The Food Industry

IntroductionSupply chain risk monitoring is critical to awareness and control of raw material and supplier risks – which can directly affect the risk profile of your finished products. The purpose of this post is to bring together a range of informational resources,...

Implementing a Robust Food Safety and Quality Manual

Implementing a Robust Food Safety and Quality Manual

The food safety and quality manual represents the documented system of management for a food manufacturer. It is the framework of management that governs all operational processes. In this post, we’ll explore the composition of a food safety and quality manual and how...

An Introduction to Food Specifications

An Introduction to Food Specifications

Specifications serve a lot of important purposes in food manufacturing. Most obviously, they’re used to establish quality expectations for suppliers and customers exchanging food products – but more broadly, specifications can be a vehicle for transmitting information...

Everything You Need to Know About Record Completion and Maintenance

Everything You Need to Know About Record Completion and Maintenance

In the food industry, record completion and maintenance is an essential part of compliance and diligence. Records provide a valuable defence of evidence for companies in the event of a legal dispute. Aside from providing evidence of diligence and process control,...

Maximising The Benefits from Internal Audits in Food Manufacturing

Maximising The Benefits from Internal Audits in Food Manufacturing

Internal audits in food manufacturing are a valuable tool when it comes to identifying areas of improvement and increasing efficiency. They can help to identify weaknesses, strengths, and discrepancies in compliance, while also providing an opportunity to discover...

Food Industry Hub blog

The Food Industry Hub blog includes practical discussion for food manufacturing professionals across technical, cultural, management and professional themes.

This post is part of the category:

Stay connected with Food Industry Hub

Receive Food Industry Hub updates, resources and practical content for food manufacturing businesses and professionals.

Stay informed about new resources, articles, tools and Food Industry Hub service developments.

Raise the standard for how food gets made.