Know: Change Control Procedures

Sector-Specific Information

The Food Industry Hub knowledge centre delivers a wide range of sector-specific information for food industry professionals.

The below is one topic from our knowledge centre. You can return to all topics by clicking here.

Change Control Procedures

Definition

Change control procedures in food manufacturing are formal processes used to manage and document changes in materials, processes, equipment, or systems that could influence food safety, quality, or regulatory compliance. These procedures aim to ensure that all changes are evaluated, approved, and implemented systematically to minimise risks and maintain product integrity.

As a critical element of a quality management system (QMS), change control applies to diverse changes, including procedures, production methods, suppliers and materials, formulations, packaging, equipment, and facility modifications.

Practical Application

Effective change control involves several stages: initiation, evaluation, approval, implementation, and post-change review. Each stage plays a role in ensuring the change is managed effectively and meets safety, quality, and compliance requirements.

1. Initiation:
   A change is identified and formally documented, typically using a standardised form. The change request is assigned a unique identifier to ensure traceability.
• Example: A company decides to replace a raw material with a cost-effective alternative and submits a formal change request.
2. Evaluation:
   A multidisciplinary team evaluates the change for potential impacts on food safety, quality, and compliance. Risk assessments are central to this process, considering hazards such as microbiological risks, allergen cross-contact, or deviations in product characteristics.
• Example: A proposal to replace a wheat-based ingredient with a gluten-free substitute requires labelling updates, allergen assessments, and microbiological testing.
3. Approval:
   The proposed change is reviewed and approved by authorised personnel, such as technical managers or regulatory specialists. Supporting data, including trial results or validation studies, is essential for informed decision-making.
• Example: Changing equipment requires validation to confirm that critical control points (CCPs) for food safety remain effective.
4. Implementation:
   The approved change is implemented in a controlled manner, often phased to minimise disruptions. Clear communication with stakeholders and staff training are critical for successful implementation.
• Example: Introducing a new cleaning procedure involves staff training and updating standard operating procedures (SOPs).
5. Post-Change Review:
   The implemented change is monitored to confirm its effectiveness and ensure no unintended consequences arise. Routine inspections, testing, and performance reviews are conducted as part of this stage.
• Example: After adopting a new packaging material, microbiological testing ensures finished product standards remain intact over the life of the product.

Related Concepts

• Document Control: Ensures updated documents are available, and obsolete ones are properly retired, supporting effective change implementation.
• Risk Assessment: Provides a framework for identifying and mitigating hazards associated with proposed changes.
• Validation and Verification: Confirms that the change achieves the intended outcomes (validation) and maintains ongoing compliance (verification).
• Supplier Management: Changes involving suppliers, such as sourcing new raw materials, often require supplier audits and updated specifications.
• Regulatory Compliance: Changes must align with applicable laws, such as food labelling regulations or food contact material standards.

Expert Insights

Change control is a complex aspect of food manufacturing. Take care to ensure food safety and regulatory compliance while enabling continuous improvement and cost efficiency.

Common Challenges:

• Communication Gaps: Ineffective communication can lead to inconsistent implementation across departments.
• Resistance to Change: Staff hesitancy highlights the importance of training and inclusive planning.
• Risk Underestimation: Small changes, such as ingredient substitutions, can have significant ripple effects, such as changes in allergen exposure.

Best Practices:

• Implement digital tools to manage change requests, track approvals, and maintain detailed records.
• Engage a multidisciplinary team, including representatives from quality assurance (QA), production, procurement, and regulatory affairs, during the evaluation phase.

Conclusion

Change control procedures are indispensable for maintaining food safety, quality, and regulatory compliance in this evolving industry. By adopting a structured, risk-based approach to managing changes, food manufacturers can minimise risks, drive innovation, and enhance operational efficiency. These procedures support continuous improvement and protect consumer trust while ensuring adherence to regulatory and certification standards.

About The Food Industry Hub Knowledge Centre

The Food Industry Hub knowledge centre delivers informative content on a variety of topics pertinent to the food manufacturing industry.